in

Love ItLove It

Evidence for the Accuracy of Genesis from the Flood Stories

Image courtesy of publicdomainpictures.net.

If the biblical account of Noah’s Ark is accurate, then everyone on Earth is a descendant of Noah and his wife along with their sons and their wives, however many wives they all had. Although the Bible only names Shem, Ham and Japheth as Noah’s sons, it is theoretically possible that some unnamed sons and daughters were also included. Polygamy was common at the time and women were generally left unmentioned. Of course anything beyond the eight people specified is pure speculation. We have no way of knowing.

Regardless of how many human passengers rode on the ark, all of humanity from that point on would share the flood as the oldest event in which everyone’s ancestors shared. We might expect that someone other than the author of Genesis might have reported on the flood. In fact, flood stories, as they are known to those who study such matters, are quite common and found all over the world.

The best known of these is the Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh. Pointing to the fact that the Epic was committed to writing before the book of Genesis, some scholars have concluded that the Bible copied the story of Noah from it. However this is most likely not the case. Here’s why:

  • Details tend to go from simple to complex as stories get passed on. The ark in Genesis was basically a floating box. In Gilgamesh it is a ship capable of being steered. If Genesis is the younger story, why would the authors have “dumbed down” the ark?
  • Details tend to get exaggerated as the story evolves. For example, people in Noah’s time are said to have lived to be over 900 years old. In The Epic of Gilgamesh the ages are around 36,000 years, much more exaggerated and, therefore, likely to be the younger story.

But didn’t I say that the Babylonian account was written first? Yes, and that is easy to explain. The ancient Hebrews were nomadic, living in tents and moving around a lot. Carrying around written material would be an unnecessary burden. The Babylonians, on the other hand, had relatively large (for the time) established cities. They had places to store written material so it is not surprising that they wrote down their account. The Hebrews, on the other hand, commited the information to memory and passed it from parents to offspring until it became practical for them to commit it to writing.

The Babylonians are not the only alternative flood story. The following cultures also had stories in which their god(s) destroyed the world, wiping out all but a handful of people who rode out the flood in a large boat which also carried animals. Here is a partial list:

  • Most Native American cultures such as the Hopi
  • Ancient Greece
  • Sumeria
  • Ireland (Lebor Gabála Érenn – Cessair)
  • Norse (Bergelmir)
  • Finland
  • The Kwaya, Mbuti, Maasai, Mandin, and Yoruba peoples of Africa.
  • India
  • China
  • Korea
  • Malaysia
  • The Philippines
  • Polynesia & Hawaii
  • South America Indians such as the Canari, Incas, Mapuche, Muisca and Tupi

How similar are these accounts:

  • Almost all of the accounts say that eight people out of all the world were saved.
  • All of the accounts involve a large ship although there are differences in the technological complexity of the ship.
  • A bird is sent out to see if the flood has subsided although the type of bird can vary.

It is hard to think of an explanation for the distribution and similarities of these stories other than all of mankind has this event in common. Clearly the biblical account is the most accurate and, therefore, the genuine account.

© 2018 Gary J. Sibio. All rights reserved.

What do you think?

8 points
Legend

Written by Gary J Sibio

Wordsmith BuddySmarty PantsLoyal BuddyBookwormBuddy BossYears Of MembershipStory MakerImage MakerQuiz MakerUp/Down VoterList MakerEmoji AddictVerified UserContent Author

12 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. I’ve never been particularly interested in science and trying to prove the Bible. I have just believed it is true in it’s revelation of who God is and how he had reached out to save us and believe there is good evidence for that.I see it all around me in nature. When I see the complexity of created things, I know there’s a lot of intelligence behind their creation. It’s also quite easy to see how people could have become very wicked and deserving of judgement such as the flood. What is amazing is God’s salvation, both of Noah and his family and of all who came later and had faith in God’s salvation and had it counted to them as righteousness.

    • It’s not so much that I set out to prove the Bible scientifically. I was more interested in showing that, despite what the skeptics claim, it is not only reasonable to accept the Bible at face value but it can make more sense than rejecting it.

      As far as complexity and design, have you ever read “Darwin’s Black Box” by Michael Behe? Although Behe is a biochemist, the book is not overly technical. His premise is that there are processes at the cellular level that are so complex that they could not be the result of random mutations and so necessary that they couldn’t have developed over time. An excellent read.

  2. One of the biggest arguments I’ve heard against a great flood has been along the lines of “Where did the extra water come from and where did it go?” The Bible actually answers that. The water came from above (rain) and from an upwelling from below. In 2014, scientists at a couple universities found indications that there is a layer of water 150-300 miles deep containing about 3 times more water than all of the oceans, combined. If that water upwelled, it would easily be enough to account for a globe-covering flood.

    Then there is the genetic evidence that came out in the 1980’s that shows that a number of thousand years ago, there was a genetic bottleneck for humans. The only thing that explains it would be if nearly all humans suddenly died.

    • The other thing is that the Earth’s mountains may not have been as tall before the flood so less water than we think might have covered them. Geology is not my strong suite but I’ve read that the weight of the water may have pushed them up. I’m not sure how that would have worked but I suppose it would be possible.

Leave a Reply