As per usual, please take a look at the larger versions and then vote for your favorite. Once again, it helps me most when you explain your preference, so I understand what is working and what isn’t…
-
which version do you prefer?
-
soft treatment
-
sharp treatment
-
splitting the difference is like dividing something evenly
I went for the sharp one. It might be due to being exposed to murky elements recently. I am badly affected by environmental conditions recently.
we shall test that with an updated image in the future
I picked the softer one, thank you for sharing
I thank you for voting, please look forward to the final version
I voted for the sharp one, too
Thanks for lending a hand, ellie25!
I voted for the softer, the other was too busy for me.
suddenly, the tide turns…
I like being different.
I like you regardless of your similarity
thank you for sharing your opinion
I figure the background might stand to soften a bit but the figure needs to stay sharp
AM I the only one who prefers the non-sharp version?
The sharp one looks too “aggressive” for the eye to me…
It is perhaps a little too attention grabbing
it is but not exactly in a good comfortable way, at least to me
yeah, I should dial it back somewhat
I find the sharp treatment a little clearer than the soft treatment on this one.
this is the virtue of a sharp treatment
yes the sharp treatment is much clearer
sharpening makes the image clear in one way but also noisy…
I find the sharp treatment a little clearer than the soft treatment on this one. I love the photo as well this is really cute.
thanks for letting me know your thoughts on the subject
This is like the eye exam where one is a little fuzzy and the other is too sharp. I would like to see a middle ground on this one. Do you have a filter that could soften without distorting?
I have more settings than you can shake a stick at. Which is kinda the problem. But I agree, it doesn’t really seem like either extreme is going to work here…
Better is the second version … but I agree that there could be something in the middle.
I will try to split the difference, perhaps with a sharper bias
is this an endorsement for splitting the difference?
splitting the difference is like dividing something evenly
this is the plan, and you can judge the results for yourself when it is done
So do I, and who knows- perhaps we both get what we want
don’t ever let anyone tell you you’re not an optimist
So where are you now; glass half empty or wrong drink?
there are three types of people; glass half empty, glass half full and this isn’t what I ordered…
I don’t know how to explain it any more clearly than I just did
you and me, both… too many replies to keep straight
yeah, if it all went unsaid nobody would miss it
it figures I can reply to this one, which doesn’t require a reply…
your replies aren’t being credited?
I wonder if that is a bug or an unannounced policy change
that makes sense, the cutoff is three replies?