The English language contains a large number of idioms and sayings. Many of these are misused by substituting one word for another or leaving a word out of the saying. The resultant can be nonsense or even funny. Almost always, they aren’t meant the way that they are used. Here are seven examples.
I could care less
This is one of the most commonly misused phrases. People who use it intend to convey indifference, but when they use the phrase, “I could care less”, they are actually saying the opposite of what they intend.
For instance, if I ask my wife what she wants to have for dinner and she says that she could care less, she is actually saying that she cares about what we have for dinner. If she is truly indifferent or apathetic about it, she’d more properly say, “I couldn’t care less”. ‘Could’ and ‘could not’ or “couldn’t” have opposite meanings.
It’s a mute point
This one is almost funny. If a person is making a mute point, they are making the point without speaking or making any sounds. That is what ‘mute’ means.
Unless the person making the point is a mime or is using sign language, the phrase that is most likely meant is, “It’s a moot point.” Moot means inconsequential or irrelevant.
Coming down the pipe
This phrase, though incorrect, is used to mean something that is rapidly approaching or imminent. The phrase that is meant is actually, “Coming down the pike.” In this instance, ‘pike’ is a reference to a turnpike, which is a fast-moving freeway (at least in meaning). This means that the full phrase would be ‘coming down the turnpike’ and ‘pike’ is simply the shortened form.
One in the same
Stated this way, the phrase has no meaning, at least in the way that it is commonly used. I suppose that if a person was talking about dogs and said something about a dog that was about to have a pup that the pup would be one in the same.
However, the phrase is usually used to mean something that is virtually identical to something else. The actual correct phrase should be “one and the same”.
I seen it coming
The phrase ‘I seen it coming’ has correct a meaning, but it is stated with the incorrect use of English. The desired verb is the past tense of “see”. “Seen” isn’t the past tense of “see”. Rather, ‘seen’ is the past participle of see. The correct phrase is “I saw it coming”.
People often misuse this one so commonly that it is almost scary. A person might say, “The cake recipe called for a teaspoon of baking powder and I put in a tablespoon of baking powder on accident.” It should be “I put in a tablespoon of baking powder by accident”. Otherwise, it the phrase is saying that it was done on purpose. Accidentally on purpose is a contradiction of terms.
Each was worse than the next
In this phrase, ‘next’ implies a future event or part of a sequence. The verb, ‘was’, is past tense, so the phrase would need to properly be, “Each was worse than the last”.
How many of these incorrect phrases have you used or heard? They really are quite common.
I haven’t heard anyone say any of these, so perhaps these are American mistakes! The one that really annoys me is when people say that something “couldn’t be underestimated” when they mean “couldn’t by overestimated”!
Perhaps they are indeed Yank statements, but I hear them all the time. I don’t think I’ve heard anyone saying anything about ‘couldn’t be underestimated’ so that one must be Brit. lol
I have heard them all and I catch myself saying things and wondering where those words even came from. Most do not make sense. Too funny.
I agree with that assessment. lol