in

The insignificance of I.Q.

I was at the supermarket when a little boy was racing around, making stupid sounds. The woman near me muttered; “Parents should take better control of retarded children.”

<a href="https://www.todaysparent.com/kids/preschool/5-ways-to-get-your-preschooler-to-stop-running-away-from-you/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Source</a>

I knew the little boy and his parents. Just an hour ago we were in another store when he told his mother that the gum she was chewing had ‘aspertine’ which was unhealthy.

This was child who would score genius level on an I.Q. test but behaved as if he were, as the woman beside me said; retarded.

His emotional age is about two years old.

He has no life skills, is unaware of the real world, and how to interact.

<a href="https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-young-business-boy-funny-child-glasses-little-boss-office-image60636526" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Source</a>

He may spend hours on the Internet, often playing mindless games or picking up stray facts, but without a framework he can not fit the facts into a whole.

As ‘I.Q.’ tests are culture biased or require people to think within limitations, they in no way measure ‘life coping’ skills. Nor, real intelligence.

The five year old in the example has no comprehension that his behaviour is unacceptable. He is unaware of the real world. He has no ability to comprehend  reality. Other children, with much lower I.Q.s but an awareness of reality, will do far better in life.

Which is why many institutions are no longer putting much weight on the score of a set I.Q. test.

Report

What do you think?

Written by jaylar

10 Comments

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply