Ileana Calotescu
For the second time since I was on this site, one of my posts(The Thought Of The Day – Stop Being An Aggressive Dog) was rejected for no reason. The only thing that comes to mind is that on this site it is forbidden to make your thoughts known, or to post pictures of dogs, more precisely of my dog, Maya, because both posts had as cover a picture of Maya. I’m angry and I wonder if it’s worth getting angry because a person identified himself in that post!
Maybe I should leave Virily behind.
-
It is fair to reject posts that do not break the rules?
-
Yes
-
No
-
ileana ~ I enjoy all your work and I hope nothing discourages you. We like your work and we try to eliminate those who hate.
Thank you! Someone has to work hard to discourage me. I don’t get discouraged so easily.
In the past, the admins would send an email stating the reason why a post is being rejected. I guess this not the case now.
But reading the responses here, the post was already published then rejected????
Yes. That post was rejected long after publication. Someone with a rich imagination found himself in a dog’s compartment and reported that post.🙂
I am so sorry for you. I have had some posts rejected in the past. It has happened to me. But it has happened to me before it was published and it seems you had this post published because I remember having read it.
Thank you. It was rejected a few weeks after publication.
This does not make sense. Once the post is published and approved they should not delete it.
I am so sorry that happened to you and I certainly cannot understand why. It makes me unhappy to think there are people here who want to cause trouble.
Thank you, Sandra! I hope that from now on there will be no more surprises of this kind.
This does not seem fair to me at all. I really don’t know what the admins meant. Don’t they see what’s going on on the website?
They probably see what’s going on on the website, but we don’t know for sure because they don’t communicate with us.
Maybe you’re right. In situations like this, I sometimes have a bad feeling (like doing it on purpose).
you know that post was reported to the editors and then rejected right?
I know it was reported but I don’t understand why the editors thought this article should be rejected.
I suspect the person that reported it, made a good case for it to be removed.
The person who reported did his best to destroy the peace of this place and to a large extent she succeeded.
This is not fair at all. Many of us write about many topics and I have never had anything rejected.
So sorry. 🙁
It doesn’t matters! I am glad the admins made a beneficial decision for the site!!!🙂
I agree with you. Take care.