Fine art filmmaking in the early 1980’s was done using 8mm, Super8, and 16mm film. Many of the films that I saw were made with 8mm or Super8 film stock.They were usually referred to as small gauge films. Many were silent. They utilized light and shadow, the rhythm of the splices, camera movement, focus variations, and tricks from experimental photography to create a short visual experience in motion. It was very enticing to visual artists because paintings couldn’t move. Lithographs couldn’t shift in or out of focus. Drawings would never be able to pan or zoom. Static art forms are great; but, what if they could move and change? So, in spite of the drawbacks, it became popular and screenings of small gauge, hand held films were common.
And drawbacks did exist throughout the process. It was quite expensive for a young artist to make a three minute film. They deteriorated each time they were projected so multiple copies had to made from a work print that ideally was never run through a projector. Access to a projector was also an issue. There were Kodachrome and Ektachrome days meaning you might have the wrong film stock when the weather changed. For the indoors there was Tri-X which was a very grainy film stock rarely mentioned in polite company. Cameras could be purchased at pawnshops for around ten dollars so having multiple cameras solved the issue of changing film to suit conditions. Compared to today it was a pain in the butt.
I decided to replicate the methods of the analog films using modern everyday equipment. I called the films Abstract Photography in Motion at first. They became the Abstract Photo Moto Series. This is one of the early ones that is still a favorite. An homage to the analog small gauge films in Hi-Def. And, made for next to nothing. Well, I chewed into a lot of SD Cards and batteries.
Analog methods in Hi-Def –o– Please enjoy this purely visual experience
Thank you so very much. I’m glad you stopped by. Do you prefer the Vimeo or the YouTube for watching.? I think the Vimeo is better quality but the YouTube may be more accessible to people.
Cheers
I am going to post the YT ones. I have more of them there. I agree on the YT. Thanks.
With this video too…
“The connection has timed out
The server at player.vimeo.com is taking too long to respond. “
Shoot. This was something I had not considered. You could find many at my YouTube page. I did post one from the Tube but it is still waiting in the pending. Try here maybe – https://www.youtube.com/user/vitrioso
Thanks for trying to see them. I am unsure if I can do anything to fix this. Maybe the YouTube embedding will work better. I did both because it was the first try at embedding.
Yeah! I can watch it well on YT. Thanks, Howard.
Very interesting projects!
Albert, Something I never considered was phones. I am really not up to date with the new phones. I have never used a phone to access the internet. Videos may not be good for phones. Sorry. (this is reply #2)
Cheers.
No, I watch your Youtube from a laptop, not a cellphone…
Excellent job Howard. Glad to see you posting again.
Thanks. I know that this kind of thing is pretty obscure. Thanks for watching. I do have a YouTube page that is linked on my profile page here although it is so small one would never know. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Oa1Ye33fz0