shiny (2/6) List item Submitted to "OLOC background studies – WIP" Approved by Alex Ledante April 17, 2019, 3:14 am 63 Views 6 Votes 32 Comments Share Tweet Pin it’s a good look, but not for this piece MoreReport Item navigation Previous submission Next submission View full list Share Tweet Pin Written by Alex Ledante facebook pinterest twitter 32 Comments Leave a Reply That is a good idea. 1 Log in to Reply I suppose a certain amount of ambiguity could be considered a level of protection Log in to Reply You did a very good job of keeping the explanation simple. 1 Log in to Reply thanks. I try to be concise 1 Log in to Reply At least I have learned the cause of cancer from radiation. 1 Log in to Reply there’s generally a reason for everything. I like to at least learn the simple explanation… Log in to Reply Thank you for sharing the cause of cancer from radiation. 1 Log in to Reply I’m not a doctor, but that is my understanding of the process Log in to Reply That explains what was the cause of the cancer. 1 Log in to Reply cancer is essentially cells that duplicate imperfectly and don’t stop. think of it as a replication error Log in to Reply I remember the stories of the post war Japanese cities that were hit by the atomic bombs where the populace died from cancer years after the war ended. 1 Log in to Reply radiation usually results in cell mutation, which most frequently presents itself as cancer Log in to Reply I have heard that some non lethal radiation does cause illnesses. 1 Log in to Reply mostly cancer of some form or another Log in to Reply That is true since radiation is a killer. 1 Log in to Reply even non lethal doses of radiation can really ruin your month… Log in to Reply That is true since cities can be rebuilt faster after an earthquake or tornado than a nuclear meltdown. 1 Log in to Reply you don’t even want to survey until the rad levels have hit background Log in to Reply Next to an earthquake and floods, nuclear meltdowns are very scary. 1 Log in to Reply earthquakes and floods leave an aftermath, but a perpetual meltdown is a disaster for decades Log in to Reply I guess we all love to gamble with danger. 1 Log in to Reply I certainly do not. Especially when it comes to meltdowns Log in to Reply I do have limited knowledge of nuclear plant meltdowns. 1 Log in to Reply why the hell are we still using Tokamak reactors? Log in to Reply A waste containment tank would look ugly when messed with. 1 Log in to Reply agreed, shiny and new don’t work here Log in to Reply Appearances are deceiving in the world of nuclear plant meltdowns. 1 Log in to Reply okay, you got me there… Log in to Reply these are going to be in the extreme background, if they are in there at all… Log in to Reply not my fault if it goes over your head Log in to Reply The shiny tank looks good. 1 Log in to Reply the surface is nice, but not for a waste containment tank- that should look corroded Log in to Reply Leave a Reply Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.
there’s generally a reason for everything. I like to at least learn the simple explanation… Log in to Reply
cancer is essentially cells that duplicate imperfectly and don’t stop. think of it as a replication error Log in to Reply
I remember the stories of the post war Japanese cities that were hit by the atomic bombs where the populace died from cancer years after the war ended. 1 Log in to Reply
radiation usually results in cell mutation, which most frequently presents itself as cancer Log in to Reply
That is true since cities can be rebuilt faster after an earthquake or tornado than a nuclear meltdown. 1 Log in to Reply
earthquakes and floods leave an aftermath, but a perpetual meltdown is a disaster for decades Log in to Reply
That is a good idea.
I suppose a certain amount of ambiguity could be considered a level of protection
You did a very good job of keeping the explanation simple.
thanks. I try to be concise
At least I have learned the cause of cancer from radiation.
there’s generally a reason for everything. I like to at least learn the simple explanation…
Thank you for sharing the cause of cancer from radiation.
I’m not a doctor, but that is my understanding of the process
That explains what was the cause of the cancer.
cancer is essentially cells that duplicate imperfectly and don’t stop. think of it as a replication error
I remember the stories of the post war Japanese cities that were hit by the atomic bombs where the populace died from cancer years after the war ended.
radiation usually results in cell mutation, which most frequently presents itself as cancer
I have heard that some non lethal radiation does cause illnesses.
mostly cancer of some form or another
That is true since radiation is a killer.
even non lethal doses of radiation can really ruin your month…
That is true since cities can be rebuilt faster after an earthquake or tornado than a nuclear meltdown.
you don’t even want to survey until the rad levels have hit background
Next to an earthquake and floods, nuclear meltdowns are very scary.
earthquakes and floods leave an aftermath, but a perpetual meltdown is a disaster for decades
I guess we all love to gamble with danger.
I certainly do not. Especially when it comes to meltdowns
I do have limited knowledge of nuclear plant meltdowns.
why the hell are we still using Tokamak reactors?
A waste containment tank would look ugly when messed with.
agreed, shiny and new don’t work here
Appearances are deceiving in the world of nuclear plant meltdowns.
okay, you got me there…
these are going to be in the extreme background, if they are in there at all…
not my fault if it goes over your head
The shiny tank looks good.
the surface is nice, but not for a waste containment tank- that should look corroded