Love ItLove It

Sticking Cattle: Kindness or Violence?

Sometimes people equate an act of kindness as a sort of violence. Naturally, each person must make up their own mind about that, however, this is the case of sticking cattle.

I’m sure that a lot of people who’ve never been around cattle have very little idea of what it means to stick a cow, steer, or bull. I believe that I’ve mentioned the procedure before, but just as a recap and explanation, cattle are ruminants. That is, they “chew the cud”. 

What this means is that they have a stomach that is divided into four chambers. The first chamber is simply for holding what they eat; grass, hay, weeds, or what-not. Later, at their leisure, mouthfuls of the material in the first chamber are regurgitated so the animal can take its time thoroughly chewing the material up. This is chewing the cud. 

Once they finish the chewing of the cud, it is swallowed and it passes into the second chamber of the stomach, where digestion begins.

Normally, the cattle need no help for humans for any of this to happen. It is entirely natural to ruminants; cattle, deer, goats, and so forth.

However, once in a while, the cattle get into dense, nutrient-rich, green, wet food. For instance, they might get into a field of growing alfalfa. A densely growing field of alfalfa doesn’t occur in nature, so normally this situation wouldn’t occur, but farmers sometimes grow alfalfa so it can become hay that can be fed to livestock later. Hay isn’t nearly as rich, once it has been cut and dried.

Now, cattle aren’t very intelligent animals. If they find themselves in a field of growing alfalfa, they will gorge themselves on the alfalfa until they can’t eat more. All of this material is passed into the first chamber of the stomach. Because of the temperature, moisture, bacteria, and contents, the material begins to quickly ferment, producing carbon dioxide and methane. 

The first chamber of the stomach can only hold just so much and since it is already filled with plant material, the gas causes it to expand. This is a life-threatening situation. If that chamber bursts, like an over-filled balloon, it is likely that the animal will die. The cow is also in considerable pain, just as you are if you have a severe gas attack.

The solution is to “stick” the cow. This amounts to puncturing the first chamber of the stomach to release the trapped gas. As mean as this may sound, it doesn’t hurt the animal and the puncture heals quickly. It also gives them relief from the severe pain. 

The purpose and the procedure aren’t difficult to understand and the consequences of doing nothing are just as easy to grasp. Yet, some people see the act of puncturing the stomach as violence and cruelty to the animal. It doesn’t seem to matter that the alternative is for the animal to suffer tremendous pain before dying of bloating and a ruptured stomach. 

To me, sticking a cow is being kind rather than being violent or cruel, but I suppose that it depends on how a person wants to define violence and cruelty. Another person, myself, for instance, could see it as violent and cruel not to stick the cow in this situation.

  • Do you feel that sticking a cow, as I’ve just explained it, is violent or cruel?

    • Yes, it is violent and cruel
    • No, it is kind


What do you think?

11 Points

Written by Rex Trulove

Story MakerPoll MakerQuiz MakerYears Of MembershipList MakerGallery MakerImage MakerEmbed MakerContent Author


Leave a Reply
    • I honestly want to understand. So allowing the cow to agonize because it is bloated until it dies because its stomach explodes is less violent than making a simple puncture that relieves the gas and the pain and allows the animal to live? This simply doesn’t make sense to me. People often have invasive procedures to relieve pain and to save their lives, yet few people think of them as violent, even if they involve lancing a boil or an abscess. I love animals too, but to me, this is the same thing. Mind you, I don’t go to doctors and haven’t for decades, but it isn’t because they are violent.

    • This sometimes even happens to cattle are fenced in. If they can see and smell lush green growth, they can force themselves even through a sturdy fence. Thankfully, most (not all) ranchers and farmers know better than to pasture their cattle immediately adjacent to fields that are used to grow alfalfa, grain, or hay, so it isn’t common.

      I’m not sure I’d call the pasture “wild” because most of it isn’t. However, it isn’t intentionally plowed, seeded, or watered, either. Most pasture land here is rather between being wild and being cultivated. The fields of alfalfa, grass hay, and grain that are grown *are* cultivated, though, and that is where the problem comes up.

Leave a Reply